tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2681945428166711421.post6056159344722050424..comments2011-08-15T15:30:32.287+10:00Comments on Rachael's Ebook Ramble: A new e-book isn’t always newRachaelMchttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05783639473619591512noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2681945428166711421.post-10728081396726175462010-04-18T14:01:36.712+10:002010-04-18T14:01:36.712+10:00These are good points Rachael. Speaking as a publi...These are good points Rachael. Speaking as a publisher, sometimes we have control over the metadata fields and sometimes we don't. If we don't, and there is only one field for publish date, I will always select the original print publication date. But perhaps we should be including the original year in the description too in case our vendor messes up the publish and release dates. As we try and distribute more ebooks along the supply chain, I can see this problem getting worse, not better, as different vendors provide different release dates depending on when they received the book.Linda Nix, The Federation Presshttp://www.federationpress.com.aunoreply@blogger.com